Я считаю, что совершенно неважно, кто и как будет в партии голосовать; но вот что чрезвычайно важно, это - кто и как будет считать голоса.The people who cast votes decide nothing. What matters is who counts the votes and how.
Some years ago I heard this interesting story by a Hawaiian man about the way the Statehood referendum was held. His father had been a precinct captain in Pauoa and he said that certain people--both Hawaiian and non-Hawaiians--who were known in the community to oppose Statehood, when they had voted at his precinct their ballots were placed in a special box. When it was time to collect the ballot boxes, men from the US Army carried it away on Army trucks with the keys to the ballot box to 'Iolani Palace. His father believed that the US Army men destroyed the special "ballot boxes". When I first heard this story, I thought this was rather fanciful and sounded like a grand conspiracy. I know that there probably was irregularities. John Kealoha, the Lieutenant-Governor under Governor William F. Quinn and brother in law of my grandmother, had remarked to my grandmother that territorial elections were far from "acceptable" and said that the Secretary of the Territory--which was the second highest appointed office in Hawai'i and was replaced by an elected Lieutenant-Govenor after Statehood--had been rigging votes for years. One may recall that in 1960, Kealoha accused Quinn and the Republican Party's machinery of rigging the US presidential elections in favor of Richard Nixon and ordered a recall. Kealoha also ran against Quinn--thought they both were Republicans--on an anti-corruption platform. It
So the question is, how credible was the Statehood referendum? Its widely known today that in 1946 Hawai'i was listed as a Non-Self-Governing Territory and in theory Hawai'i should have been given various political options including independence, free association, Commonwealth, or incorporation. The 1959 referendum only had one option: incorporation.
|Statehood Ballot with the Certification of the Secretary of the Territory|
It would make sense that the US military would "transport" ballot boxes from precincts to 'Iolani Palace because they had the transportation to, especially given that Hawai'i was still recovering from World War II and that the civilian government had been removed from power for over three long years (1941-1944). US President Dwight Eisenhower, himself once a military governor of occupied West Germany, also made several stops in Hawai'i prior to the Statehood referendum on his way to occupied Japan. Mary Dudziak's book, Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy, explains that that Eisenhower was being pressured by the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China, and other powers about the US' human rights records including its colonial possessions of Hawai'i and Alaska. One could conceivably imagine a US president--who had just authorized the 1952 coup against the democratically elected government in Iran--concerned about how propaganda might affect American relations in Europe and Asia would hint to his appointee about the necessity of securing Hawai'i and removing any potential "red" propaganda. It would have also been easy to manoeuvres an election to their preferred outcome as they had control of the ballots, the newspapers, and the Army.
So the question is did they?